For example, right now, two of the most popular firewalls are Cisco ASA and Palo Alto. DIFFERENT LOG FORMATSĮach firewall has its own log format, and the format can change from version to version. Many VPN and firewall log monitoring problems are similar to log management in general. VPN and firewall log management gives real-time visibility into security risks. Virtual private networks (VPNs) help secure data, but they are also challenging to bring into your log monitoring and management strategy. With that in mind, you should start putting more robust cybersecurity controls in place to mitigate risk. for this interface and for testing porposes.The hybrid workforce is here to stay. It is all allowed on the interface and also on the zone. Ident-reset http https ike netconf ping reverse-telnet reverse-ssh rlogin rpm rsh snmp snmp-trap ssh telnet traceroute xnm-clear-text xnm-sslĪddresses, Flags: Is-Preferred Is-Primaryĭestination: 10.16.251/24, Local: 10.16.251.1 Logical interface st0.0 (Index 80) (SNMP ifIndex 540)įlags: No-Multicast SNMP-Traps Encapsulation: Secure-TunnelĪllowed host-inbound traffic : bootp bfd bgp dns dvmrp igmp ldp msdp nhrp ospf pgm pim rip router-discovery rsvp sap vrrp dhcp finger ftp tftp + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both I have another SRX box connected to the 650 and i can ping the tunnel interface from the 650 to the SRX100. Protocol: ESP, Authentication: hmac-sha1-96, Encryption: 3des-cbcĪnti-replay service: counter-based enabled, Replay window size: 64ĭirection: outbound, SPI: d0a4534c, AUX-SPI: 0Īnd no at the moment i have no route configured to the LAN behind the PALOALTO because at the moment i want to just ping the ip address of the remote-tunnel-interface on the PALO ALTO which are in the same subnet so i dont have to setup an own route for it. Mode: tunnel, Type: dynamic, State: installed
Local Gateway: 213.XX, Remote Gateway: 88.XXXX Show security ipsec security-associations detail
Pre-shared-key ascii-text "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" Īuthentication-algorithm hmac-sha-256-128 ĭestination-address addr_192_168_253_0_24 You may need to setup the IKE policy to include the proxy identity to make sure the tunnel can pass traffic. If you need more informations please let me know. Policies are on both side any any in the apropriate zones and interfaces. Pre-shared-key ascii-text "$9$MWXXXXXXXO87dVbYGUHdbw2oJiHCApORc" # SECRET-DATA Pre-shared-key ascii-text "$9$Tz6CAt0cSeCXXXXXXXXtpOIEleY24JDH" # SECRET-DATA
ID Gateway Port Algorithm SPI Life:sec/kb Mon vsysġ31078 88. 500 ESP:3des/sha1 bc72d934 2465/ unlim - root Show security ipsec security-associations Index Remote Address State Initiator cookie Responder cookie Modeħ898554 88. UP 05fc4b4bcf536e33 9833688f187823a5 Aggressive IPSec security associations: 1 created, 1 deleted Initiator cookie: 05fc4b4bcf536e33, Responder cookie: 9833688f187823a5Įxchange type: Aggressive, Authentication method: Pre-shared-keys Show security ike security-associations 88. detail Show security ipsec statistics index 131078ĪH authentication failures: 0, Replay errors: 0ĮSP authentication failures: 0, ESP decryption failures: 0 Here are some config and detailed outputs from my srx side. Where can i look to see what happens or what can i post that somebody of you can help me through that problem. We have already Phase1 and Phase2 up and running but the problem is that we get no traffic through the tunnel. Hi guys, we need to setup a VPN between SRX and PaloAlto.
0 kommentar(er)
